User loginNavigation |
archivesTrouble understanding Danvy's functional unparsingI've read Danvy's paper here[1], and I fail to understand why CPS is necessary for the types to work out. I've written a basic version of "functional sprintf" in OCaml that doesn't use CPS and seems to typecheck fine:
let float_ s i = s ^ string_of_float i let (@) f g s a b = g (f s a) b let sprintf fmt = fmt "" let (_s : string) = [1]: http://www.brics.dk/RS/98/12/BRICS-RS-98-12.pdf |
Browse archivesActive forum topics
|
Recent comments
11 weeks 1 day ago
15 weeks 3 days ago
17 weeks 11 hours ago
17 weeks 11 hours ago
19 weeks 5 days ago
24 weeks 2 days ago
24 weeks 2 days ago
24 weeks 5 days ago
24 weeks 5 days ago
27 weeks 4 days ago