Charles Stewart

typetitle sort iconauthorlast post
StoryWhat Are The Resolved Debates in General Purpose Language Design? James Iry2014-03-31 20:55
StoryThe marriage of bisimulations and Kripke logical relations Charles Stewart2014-02-01 12:46
StoryA Tail-Recursive Machine with Stack Inspection Dave Herman2013-10-01 15:34
StoryWhy Did M.I.T. Switch from Scheme to Python? Leon P Smith2013-09-12 17:06
StoryHistory of Logic Programming: What went wrong, What was done about it, and What it might mean for the future Ehud Lamm2013-07-28 20:42
StoryFoundations of Inference Paul Snively2013-05-21 03:54
StoryObservational Equality, Now! James Iry2013-05-16 02:24
Forum topicPeter Van Roy: Programming Paradigms for Dummies Torsten Anders2013-04-05 15:06
Forum topicDesigning a languge — what theory is a must? pgregory2012-09-28 19:01
Forum topicEnso: William Cook's new programming model Rafael2012-08-29 17:46
Forum topicHow to respect language styles while translating? raould2012-07-24 18:15
Forum topicEncoding System Fw in predicative dependent type theory Matt M2012-05-24 22:00
Forum topicRetrospective Thoughts on BitC raould2012-04-18 16:43
Forum topicCareer paths and concerns Jonathan Schuster2012-03-31 18:04
StorySocial Processes and Proofs of Theorems and Programs Luke Gorrie2012-03-19 13:02
StoryComputing Needs Time Allan McInnes2012-03-05 19:35
Forum topicTeaching challenge: culturally enriching formulae-as-types Charles Stewart2012-02-18 22:10
Forum topicEmbedding Prolog in Haskell Frank Atanassow2012-02-13 17:04
StoryVellvm: Formalizing the LLVM Intermediate Representation for Verified Program Transformations Paul Snively2012-02-09 18:04
Forum topicSmall is Beautiful: the design of Lua bashyal2012-02-07 14:33
StoryBeyond pure Prolog: Power and danger Charles Stewart2012-01-23 10:54
Forum topicWhat is this type of type called? Steven StewartGallus2011-12-17 03:35
Forum topicProofs of a type system's safety? Steven StewartGallus2011-12-07 13:24
StoryLTL types FRP Charles Stewart2011-11-26 23:39
Forum topicmath proofs are more robust than computer proofs raould2011-11-18 20:27