User loginNavigation |
archivesIs "post OO" just over?While studying the conference program of the upcoming OOPSLA 2006 I discovered under the category "essay" an author who has quite something critical to say about AOP:
This is not just another internet rant about the latest PL hype but the author, Friedrich Steimann, had done interesting work about AOP before. In particular his latest paper about typed AOP: AOP and the antinomy of the liar but also his award winning former critical AOP review: By Kay Schluehr at 2006-09-24 10:50 | Critiques | Meta-Programming | OOP | Paradigms | 22 comments | other blogs | 16543 reads
What Makes Erlang Processes Tick?I was amazed to see the article concerning the C implemented Apache versus the Erlang implemented Yaws and immediately went looking for how Erlang emulated its processes. What I could not find after reading "Making reliable distributed systems in the presence of software errors", and "The development of Erlang" was what was making the magic happen. What is this high level of concurrency attributed to; bytecode instructions, abstractions built upon continuations, erlang-style trampolines, what? I would like to learn more about concurrency in general (and more specifically, its implementation), even to the point of playing around with these new ideas in Common Lisp and Scheme. I have reviewed CL-MUPROC, Termite, and Distel; and so far Distel seems to be the most interesting due to its lack of need for any underlying thread or process implemenation. Can anyone provide me some insight, whether explaination as to how Erlang makes process magic or Lisp equivalents, or reference readings to learn more about the subject. Thank you for your time, Mark Stahl References: |
Browse archivesActive forum topics |
Recent comments
36 weeks 9 hours ago
36 weeks 12 hours ago
36 weeks 12 hours ago
1 year 6 weeks ago
1 year 10 weeks ago
1 year 11 weeks ago
1 year 11 weeks ago
1 year 14 weeks ago
1 year 19 weeks ago
1 year 19 weeks ago