User loginNavigation |
archivesLALR grammar of C++Recently i had a look on Roskind's C++ grammar. It is used by Yacc to generate parser for C++. But in gcc and even in eclipse CDT's parser these people havent used parser generated by Yacc. I tried to find out why LALR grammar of C++ is not a popular choice for these tools. Somewhere I read that it is difficult to build the symbol table with LALR parsing of C++. Is it correct? why it is so? Tangible Functional ProgrammingA March 27, 2007 draft of a paper by Conal Elliot:
Expect New Major Language Within Five YearsAn eWeek article reports that "A group of software gurus gathered at TheServerSide Java Symposium to discuss the future of programming, saying we should expect to see more dynamic languages and possibly a new major language in the next five years." Some predictions mentioned:
The authors of the next big language better hurry up and release it! I find it interesting to see this degree of receptivity to new languages within a single language community, i.e. at a Java conference. Are attitudes towards new languages changing, perhaps because there's more awareness of alternative approaches these days? |
Browse archivesActive forum topics |
Recent comments
22 weeks 16 hours ago
22 weeks 20 hours ago
22 weeks 20 hours ago
44 weeks 2 days ago
48 weeks 3 days ago
50 weeks 1 day ago
50 weeks 1 day ago
1 year 5 days ago
1 year 5 weeks ago
1 year 5 weeks ago