User loginNavigation |
archivesSyntactic/Semantic Control in MDA FrameworkHi at all, 1) Two (type of) states are connected with a transition, but this transition is semanticaly senseless 2) Two (type of) states are connected with a transition, but a pre/post-condition involving other states doesn't hold. For example a transition between two (type of) states is admitted if and only if there is a transition from the fomer/latter state to another state. The first type of constraints is easy to impose: a simple table could be added to the framework so these type of senseless cuold be checked on-the-fly. The second type of constraints involve more complex reasoning, and i think there are basically two types of solutions: a) To check the models (graphs) defined by the programmers, using techniques inherited from Model Checking (formal verification). In this case the control is a post-development control. b) To define a precise syntax and semantic using graph grammars. I'm quite ignorant in the domain of graph grammars, so i don't know if these instuments are intended for this purpose. I'm writing to you 'cause i think the problem about syntax and semantic of visual programming languages is undertheorized. Alberto |
Browse archivesActive forum topics |
Recent comments
5 weeks 4 days ago
5 weeks 4 days ago
5 weeks 5 days ago
5 weeks 5 days ago
6 weeks 1 day ago
6 weeks 1 day ago
6 weeks 3 days ago
6 weeks 3 days ago
6 weeks 3 days ago
6 weeks 3 days ago