User loginNavigation |
archivesA new idea in OOP. Please comment.I have an idea: what if we can convert a class to an interface with only a requirement that the class just need implements all the member of the interface without point out the interface in its declaration (this is similar to duck-typing but it has different principle, though i didn't know about duck-typing before writing the article). And when using an object with unknown type, I think the dynamic type isn't a perfect solution (because many error-exception could occur at runtime). To read complete article, please go to this link: http://dakurai.blogspot.com/2009/06/new-wild-idea-in-oop.html . Please read and give me some reply. Thanks you. |
Browse archivesActive forum topics |
Recent comments
5 weeks 4 days ago
5 weeks 5 days ago
5 weeks 6 days ago
5 weeks 6 days ago
6 weeks 4 days ago
6 weeks 4 days ago
6 weeks 4 days ago
9 weeks 5 days ago
10 weeks 3 days ago
10 weeks 4 days ago