User loginNavigation |
archivesCurry Howard and more powerful type systemsThe ongoing thread On the (Alleged) Value of Proof for Assurance has sparked a discussion about applying the Curry Howard Isomorphism to more than intuitionistic logic and the simply typed LC. All these attempts are rather hand-wavey to me, but the discussion revolves around Isabelle and Coq, neither of which do I know. Neelk has made it pretty clear that CH does not apply to Isabelle, but it has gotten me wondering. * Is there a rigorous way to apply CH to a more powerful type system than the simply typed LC? * Is it nonsensical to try and apply it? * Does the ability to type-check non-terminating expressions have an impact? Similarly, do existential types? (I'm thinking F-Omega) * Are there any articles/books that do apply it to more powerful type systems which are accessible to someone without a PhD? |
Browse archivesActive forum topics |
Recent comments
36 weeks 1 day ago
36 weeks 1 day ago
36 weeks 1 day ago
1 year 6 weeks ago
1 year 10 weeks ago
1 year 12 weeks ago
1 year 12 weeks ago
1 year 14 weeks ago
1 year 19 weeks ago
1 year 19 weeks ago