User loginNavigation |
archivesSimple Question (I hope...): Forward declarations vs. "letrec" style or ML "and" style constructsIs there some important semantic distinction I'm missing - if we only consider _function_ and, thus, perhaps algebraic type _constructor_ definitions - or does this just end up being a simple matter of syntactic convenience or inconvenience (e.g., imagine mutually recursive object "methods" facilitated via different class "forward declaration" - just an example for which some typical Scheme "letrec" or "fix" styled syntax might be challenged). Any and all sagacious wisdom greatly appreciated. Thanks! - Scott |
Browse archivesActive forum topics |
Recent comments
2 min 23 sec ago
3 hours 42 min ago
3 hours 56 min ago
5 hours 6 min ago
10 hours 52 min ago
10 hours 57 min ago
11 hours 3 min ago
13 hours 32 min ago
15 hours 7 min ago
15 hours 49 min ago