User loginNavigation |
archivesYou got your Monads in my FOP/AOP.I'm reading a book on Feature Oriented Programming, and it seems to me that FOP/AOP suffer because it is hard to get at the join points easily in standard crappy languages. Side-effects and nested calls seemed to me to be two of the big trouble makers. So I figured if we did things in a purely functional maybe monadic or command/continuation passing style, then we'd be able to intercept things w/out restriction. In fact, couldn't we transform sad bad imperative code into such a form? What is sad to me is that, judging by a very brief look at the citations, there isn't a community of like-minded thinkers all getting together to advance this cause, which seems like it could be a very worthy one. I mean, it seems like one could commercialize this if one could take crappy C/++/Java/whatever code and perform maintenance magic on it. (Some of the citations mention people who are (or have been) active on LtU, of course since LtU is the bee's (bees'?) knees.) A very small, very random, sampling of the papers out there: * A monadic interpretation of execution levels and exceptions for AOP et. al. By raould at 2014-12-18 23:26 | LtU Forum | login or register to post comments | other blogs | 4853 reads
|
Browse archivesActive forum topics |
Recent comments
22 weeks 2 days ago
22 weeks 2 days ago
22 weeks 2 days ago
44 weeks 4 days ago
48 weeks 6 days ago
50 weeks 3 days ago
50 weeks 3 days ago
1 year 1 week ago
1 year 5 weeks ago
1 year 5 weeks ago