 Intentional Software Corporation (ISC)
started 9/17/2002; 5:46:02 AM - last post 9/27/2002; 4:32:45 AM
|
|
Ehud Lamm - Intentional Software Corporation (ISC) 
9/17/2002; 5:46:02 AM (reads: 1357, responses: 7)
|
|
|
|
Alex Moffat - Re: Intentional Software Corporation (ISC)
9/17/2002; 6:28:59 AM (reads: 1342, responses: 0)
|
|
|
Ah ha. This will be interesting to watch. Is this going to be an IDE over an existing language or languages, or an entirely new language? If the former then I can imagine people might pay for it, but people still program Java using emacs etc. even though there are free tools around.
If the latter I'm not so sure. For a new language you'd have to build the whole ecosystem of libraries and tools that have grown up around existing languages. Then you have to convince people to bet on your success to the extent of trusting the foundation of their development to your hands.
|
|
Alex Moffat - Re: Intentional Software Corporation (ISC)
9/17/2002; 6:29:39 AM (reads: 1332, responses: 0)
|
|
|
Of course, what do I know, it's not like I developed word :)
|
|
Ehud Lamm - Re: Intentional Software Corporation (ISC)
9/17/2002; 8:06:02 AM (reads: 1320, responses: 0)
|
|
|
CNET also ran this story.
|
|
Cimarron Taylor - Re: Intentional Software Corporation (ISC)
9/17/2002; 12:09:46 PM (reads: 1284, responses: 0)
|
|
|
|
jon fernquest - Re: Intentional Software Corporation (ISC)
9/18/2002; 1:23:33 AM (reads: 1229, responses: 0)
|
|
|
I thought this was a parody of LTU until I saw the NY Times article.
|
|
Chris Rathman - Re: Intentional Software Corporation (ISC)
9/18/2002; 6:58:34 AM (reads: 1211, responses: 0)
|
|
|
The blue background is probably the result of the Flash intro. Go here to skip the flash.
|
|
Ehud Lamm - Re: Intentional Software Corporation (ISC)
9/27/2002; 4:32:45 AM (reads: 918, responses: 0)
|
|
|
|
|
|
