User loginNavigation |
A New Haskell and those anxious to changeHaskell' (pronounced "Haskell prime") is being formulated while we sleep. While the committee wants to incorporate into the new standard only "tried-and-true language features", a quick glance at the mailing list shows quite a few unimplemented ideas being tossed around. The same thing happens with the C++ standardization process. Is it a good idea to keep language standardization conservative? Herb Sutter would perhaps argue so, since the export feature in C++98 was so rarely implemented. So, is conservatism right for C++0x? Is it right for Haskell'? |
Browse archives
Active forum topics
|
Recent comments
9 weeks 5 days ago
14 weeks 8 hours ago
15 weeks 4 days ago
15 weeks 4 days ago
18 weeks 2 days ago
22 weeks 6 days ago
22 weeks 6 days ago
23 weeks 2 days ago
23 weeks 2 days ago
26 weeks 1 day ago