User loginNavigation 
Expressing the Type of a While LoopThe Cat language has a primitive called while. The while construct takes two functions as argument, an invariant and a variant. Both functions consume the same number of elements from the stack. The variant (loop body) produces the same number and type of elements that it consumes. The invariant produces the same types as the variant, plus it leaves a boolean value on top of the stack. The while loop terminates when the evaluation of the invariant leaves the value false on top of the stack. The while loop pops the value false, before exiting. So the question is: how should one express this in the type system? Here is my current proposal: define while : ( a:A=any* variant:(b:A)>(c:A) invariant:(d:A)>(d:A continue:bool) ) > ( result:A ) What is good or bad about this notation? What other possibilities should I consider? By cdiggins at 20060806 16:19  LtU Forum  previous forum topic  next forum topic  other blogs  6056 reads

Browse archives
Active forum topics

Recent comments
13 weeks 6 days ago
18 weeks 1 day ago
19 weeks 6 days ago
19 weeks 6 days ago
22 weeks 3 days ago
27 weeks 1 day ago
27 weeks 1 day ago
27 weeks 4 days ago
27 weeks 4 days ago
30 weeks 2 days ago