User loginNavigation |
Typing a Functional Stack-Based LanguageI have had many helpful comments and reviews on my recent paper about Cat, but the biggest criticism seems to be that I don't motivate the paper very well. This is perhaps the hardest thing to do! The contribution of the paper is that it is the first time (AFAIK) that anyone has presented a type system for a pure functional stack-based language. To understand the implications, consider if we were to introduce the ability to use primitive operations as first class values in MSIL or JVML in a type-safe manner. So my question to the community is, is that sufficient motivation and should I emphasize these points in the paper? I have even considered rewriting the name and abstract as follows:
Perhaps this kind of paper would be more well received by the community? Thanks again for everyone's help! By cdiggins at 2007-03-14 14:49 | LtU Forum | previous forum topic | next forum topic | other blogs | 5597 reads
|
Browse archives
Active forum topics |
Recent comments
6 weeks 15 hours ago
6 weeks 19 hours ago
6 weeks 19 hours ago
28 weeks 2 days ago
32 weeks 3 days ago
34 weeks 1 day ago
34 weeks 1 day ago
36 weeks 5 days ago
41 weeks 3 days ago
41 weeks 3 days ago