User loginNavigation |
Uniqueness Typing SimplifiedUniqueness Typing Simplified, by Edsko de Vries, Rinus Plasmeijer, and David M. Abrahamson.
Uniqueness typing is related to linear typing, and their differences have been discussed here before. Linear types have many applications. This paper describes the difference between linear and unique types:
In contrast to other papers on substructural typing, such as Fluet's thesis Monadic and Substructural Type Systems for Region-Based Memory Management, this paper classifies uniqueness attributes by a kind system. This possibility was mentioned in Fluet's thesis as well, Section 4.2, footnote 8, though the technique used here seems somewhat different. Uniqueness typing is generally used to tame side-effects in purely functional languages. Uniqueness types have also been contrasted with monads on LTU, which are also used to tame effects, among other things. One point not discussed in that thread, is how straightforward it is to compile each approach into efficient code. It seems clear that uniqueness types have a straightforward, efficient compilation, but it's not clear to me how efficient monads can be, and how much work is required to make them efficient. This may make uniqueness or substructural types more suitable for just-in-time compilers than monads. |
Browse archives
Active forum topics |
Recent comments
23 weeks 1 day ago
23 weeks 1 day ago
23 weeks 1 day ago
45 weeks 2 days ago
49 weeks 4 days ago
51 weeks 1 day ago
51 weeks 1 day ago
1 year 1 week ago
1 year 6 weeks ago
1 year 6 weeks ago