User loginNavigation |
Quantitative comparison of unit testing vs. static typing?Has anyone seen an objective comparison, e.g., quantitative analysis, of whether unit testing will find the bugs an ML-ish type system will reveal? There are additional benefits to both approaches, and many claims and anecdotal experiences about these things, but I'm wondering if anyone has seen anything more objective? For example, the DiamondbackRuby etc. guys might have something like a true positive and false positive rate on checking codes that were only unit tested. Edit: Ask and ye shall receive (in a tiny part): a study of the bugs found by translating some unit tested Python apps into Haskell. By lmeyerov at 2012-03-30 17:19 | LtU Forum | previous forum topic | next forum topic | other blogs | 36757 reads
|
Browse archives
Active forum topics |
Recent comments
12 weeks 1 day ago
12 weeks 1 day ago
12 weeks 1 day ago
34 weeks 2 days ago
38 weeks 4 days ago
40 weeks 2 days ago
40 weeks 2 days ago
42 weeks 6 days ago
47 weeks 4 days ago
47 weeks 4 days ago