User loginNavigation |
Trouble understanding Danvy's functional unparsingI've read Danvy's paper here[1], and I fail to understand why CPS is necessary for the types to work out. I've written a basic version of "functional sprintf" in OCaml that doesn't use CPS and seems to typecheck fine:
let float_ s i = s ^ string_of_float i let (@) f g s a b = g (f s a) b let sprintf fmt = fmt "" let (_s : string) = [1]: http://www.brics.dk/RS/98/12/BRICS-RS-98-12.pdf By jezng at 2015-05-18 05:31 | LtU Forum | previous forum topic | next forum topic | other blogs | 3963 reads
|
Browse archives
Active forum topics |
Recent comments
22 weeks 6 days ago
23 weeks 58 min ago
23 weeks 1 hour ago
45 weeks 1 day ago
49 weeks 3 days ago
51 weeks 8 hours ago
51 weeks 8 hours ago
1 year 1 week ago
1 year 6 weeks ago
1 year 6 weeks ago