Functors are Type Refinement Systems
Paul-André Melliès and Noam Zeilberger
POPL 2015
The standard reading of type theory through the lens of category theory is based on the idea of viewing a type system as a category of well-typed terms. We propose a basic revision of this reading: rather than interpreting type systems as categories, we describe them as functors from a category of typing derivations to a category of underlying terms. Then, turning this around, we explain how in fact any functor gives rise to a generalized type system, with an abstract notion of typing judgment, typing derivations and typing rules. This leads to a purely categorical reformulation of various natural classes of type systems as natural classes of functors.
The main purpose of this paper is to describe the general framework (which can also be seen as providing a categorical analysis of refinement types), and to present a few applications. As a larger case study, we revisit Reynolds' paper on "The Meaning of Types" (2000), showing how the paper’s main results may be reconstructed along these lines.
This paper was quite a joy to read. The proposed framework feels simple yet penetrating, with convincing examples of elementary categorical constructions translating to non-trivial type system features. According to the second author, it is only the first in a series, with a much more advanced second one already available as a draft on the arXiv; I hope that this develops into a useful foundational setting for programming languages.
Recent comments
16 weeks 5 days ago
16 weeks 6 days ago
16 weeks 6 days ago
39 weeks 8 hours ago
43 weeks 2 days ago
44 weeks 6 days ago
44 weeks 6 days ago
47 weeks 4 days ago
1 year 16 hours ago
1 year 17 hours ago