User loginNavigation 
How to name the inverse functions of constructorsI am working on the design of a language (Albatross) which allows for static verification. It has a strong functional core. One of the most important types in a functional language is the inductive or algebraic type. One of the most prominent examples is a list. E.g. a list type in Albatross is declared as follows.
It has the constructor From a nonempty list we can extract the head and the tail with the following functions.
The functions The most immediate ideas are _desctructors_ or _unconstructors_ which I don't find very appealing. A better name might be _inverse constructors_ which seem to precisely describe what they are, but sound a little bit clumsy. Does anyone have a good idea on how to name these animals? Some background information on why I need these type of functions: Algebraic data types are a great tool, but they are not always the appropriate tool. E.g. in order to describe natural numbers their implementation is straighforward but awfully inefficient (this is one of the big problems when you want to extract source code from Coq). There are two ways to describe natural numbers with an efficient implementation. Either as machine numbers with modulo arithmetic or as arbitrary sized numbers where the components are machine numbers. Machine numbers are not objects of algebraic type. But they are similar. The have constructors (zero and successor) and an induction law. Furthermore they have discriminator functions ( As soon as a type has an induction law (which implicitely defines the constructor functions), discriminator functions and inverse constructors the compiler can treat these types like inductive types in order to define recursive functions (which are guaranteed to terminate), do pattern matching etc. The discriminator functions and inverse constructors are necessary for the compiler in order to be able to compile pattern matching expressions into executable code. In my opinion these pseudo algebraic/inductive types will be a great tool. Therefore I need good notions and names to express properties well. Thanks for any help. By hbrandl at 20161106 23:46  LtU Forum  previous forum topic  next forum topic  other blogs  5898 reads

Browse archivesActive forum topics 
Recent comments
47 min 41 sec ago
3 hours 35 min ago
3 hours 57 min ago
4 hours 41 min ago
5 hours 36 min ago
5 hours 39 min ago
6 hours 11 min ago
7 hours 37 min ago
10 hours 11 min ago
12 hours 27 min ago