User loginNavigation 
SemanticsRevisiting coroutines
Taking into account real or imaginary interest to control operators on LtU, I believe this paper makes nice reading. See also Coroutines in Lua. By Andris Birkmanis at 20050627 16:56  Parallel/Distributed  Semantics  2 comments  other blogs  7336 reads
A Monadic Framework for SubcontinuationsA Monadic Framework for Subcontinuations
XQuery 1.0 and XPath 2.0 Formal Semantics  Last Call
(via Michael Rys)
This is a Last Call Working Draft. Comments on this document are due no later than 15 July 2005... I guess that those interested in this area know about this, and for others it is a bit too late to get involved, but at least it's good to know the status of the formal specification. On Evaluation Contexts, Continuations, and the Rest of Computation
Although already mentioned before, I believe this paper (which reconciles two approaches to defining continuations) deserves a separate story.
On Evaluation Contexts, Continuations, and the Rest of Computation Continuations are variously understood as representations of the current evaluation context and as representations of the rest of the computation, but these understandings contradict each other: plugging an expression in a context yields a new expression whereas sending an intermediate result to a continuation yields the final answer. We show that continuationsasevaluationcontexts are the defunctionalized representation of the continuation of a singlestep reduction function and that continuationsastherestofthecomputation are the continuation of an evaluation function. Furthermore, we show that defunctionalizing the continuation of an evaluator gives rise to the same evaluation contexts as in the singlestep reducer. The only difference is how these evaluation contexts are interpreted: a â€˜plugâ€™ interpretation yields onestep reduction, whereas a â€˜refocusâ€™ interpretation yields evaluation. By Andris Birkmanis at 20050608 13:45  Lambda Calculus  Semantics  1 comment  other blogs  5936 reads
From shift and reset to polarized linear logic
By now, shift/reset should be as popular as call/cc was ten years ago. Some think these control operators are even more important in practice than call/cc, and should be directly supported by PLs. I believe, this paper by Chungchieh Shan will be interesting to many who loves logic and CurryHoward isomorphism.
From shift and reset to polarized linear logic Abstract: Griffin pointed out that, just as the pure lambdacalculus corresponds to intuitionistic logic, a lambdacalculus with firstclass continuations corresponds to classical logic. We study how firstclass delimited continuations, in the form of Danvy and Filinskiâ€™s shift and reset operators, can also be logically interpreted. First, we refine Danvy and Filinskiâ€™s type system for shift and reset to distinguish between pure and impure functions. This refinement not only paves the way for answer type polymorphism, which makes more terms typable, but also helps us invert the continuationpassingstyle (CPS) transform: any pure lambdaterm with an appropriate type is betaetaequivalent to the CPS transform of some shiftreset expression. We conclude that the lambdacalculus with shift and reset and the pure lambdacalculus have the same logical interpretation, namely good old intuitionistic logic. Second, we mix delimited continuations with undelimited ones. Informed by the preceding conclusion, we translate the lambdacalculus with shift and reset into a polarized variant of linear logic that integrates classical and intuitionistic reasoning. Extending previous work on the lambdaÂµcalculus, this unifying intermediate language expresses computations with and without control effects, on delimited and undelimited continuations, in callbyvalue and callbyname settings. By Andris Birkmanis at 20050606 19:17  Functional  Lambda Calculus  Semantics  Type Theory  15 comments  other blogs  11276 reads
The Essence of Data Access in Cw
The Essence of Data Access in Cw, The power is in the dot! Gavin Bierman, Erik Meijer, and Wolfram Schulte.
In this paper we concentrate on the data dimension. Our aim is to describe the essence of these extentions; by which we mean we identify, exemplify and formalize their essential features. Our tool is a small core language FCw, which is a valid subset of the full Cw language... we are able to formalize the type system and operational semantics of the data access fragments of Cw. If you have been following the discussions here of Cw, you already know about the language features discussed here, since the paper doesn't introduce new features. If you haven't seen Cw, section 2 is a short and readable introduction. The rest of the paper is more formal, and unless you need to prove formal results regarding Cw, might not be all that interesting. It won't hurt to keep in mind that it exists, since some of us may need something like FCw at one point or another. By Ehud Lamm at 20050528 09:07  Semantics  Type Theory  XML  login or register to post comments  other blogs  7102 reads
Nick Benton: Simple Relational Correctness Proofs for Static Analyses and Program TransformationsWe show how some classical static analyses for imperative programs, and the optimizing transformations which they enable, may be expressed and proved correct using elementary logical and denotational techniques. The key ingredients are an interpretation of program properties as relations, rather than predicates, and a realization that although many program analyses are traditionally formulated in very intensional terms, the associated transformations are actually enabled by more liberal extensional properties. We illustrate our approach with formal systems for analysing and transforming whileprograms. The first is a simple type system which tracks constancy and dependency information and can be used to perform deadcode elimination, constant propagation and program slicing as well as capturing a form of secure information flow. The second is a relational version of Hoare logic, which significantly generalizes our first type system and can also justify optimizations including hoisting loop invariants. Finally we show how a simple available expression analysis and redundancy elimination transformation may be justified by translation into relational Hoare logic. Not really exciting as such, but this technical report version of the POPL 2004 paper includes most of the proofs, which some might find helpful. By Ehud Lamm at 20050224 13:55  Implementation  Semantics  2 comments  other blogs  5503 reads
Barbara Partee: Reflections of a Formal Semanticist as of Feb 2005What follows will be a very subjective and personal view, as much my own history and development in the field and how things looked through my eyes as about the development of the field itself. This essay is about natural language semantics, but you'll find old friends here: lambdas, bindings, types, quantifiers etc. If you are lazy, go directly to footnote 25... No surprise, really, if you follow the links we give here from time to time about TLGs and such. By Ehud Lamm at 20050215 10:37  History  Lambda Calculus  Semantics  Type Theory  5 comments  other blogs  10628 reads
Normalorder directstyle betaevaluator with syntaxrules, and the repeated applications of call/cc
Oleg's presentation at the workshop in honor of Daniel Friedman is great fun as usual.
The topic of repeated applications of call/cc has been mentioned on LtU previously, a few years
ago. New this time: the full and correct betanormalizer written as a
directstyle syntaxrule. The normalizer implements calculus of
explicit substitutions. The talk presents probably the shortest (and
the fastest) normalorder betanormalizer as a (standalone) Scheme
macro. Another new feature is the discussion of selfapplications of
delimited continuation operators. The talk mentions incidentally that
shift, control, shift0 and other, lessdelimited control operators are the members of the same family: gshift/greset.
Hot stuff. By Ehud Lamm at 20050119 13:07  Lambda Calculus  MetaProgramming  Semantics  1 comment  other blogs  8091 reads
The Four QuestionsPage 4 of the lecture notes from Mitch Wand's first Principles of Programming Languages lecture:
What do you consider the fundamental properties of a programming language? By Dave Herman at 20050109 00:13  Semantics  Teaching & Learning  23 comments  other blogs  11170 reads

Browse archivesActive forum topics

Recent comments
5 hours 51 min ago
5 hours 53 min ago
4 days 18 hours ago
1 week 1 day ago
1 week 1 day ago
1 week 3 days ago
1 week 3 days ago
1 week 3 days ago
1 week 5 days ago
1 week 5 days ago