User loginNavigation |
GeneralFrege's Contribution to Philosophy of Language
Frege's Contribution to Philosophy of Language. Richard G. Heck and Robert May. Forthcoming in the Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Language, edited by E. Lepore and B. Smith.
An investigation of Frege's various contributions to the study of language, focusing on three of his most famous doctrines: that concepts are unsaturated, that sentences refer to truth-values, and that sense must be distinguished from reference. Warning: This isn't directly related to programming languages. In fact, if you haven't studied Frege this paper might be quite puzzling. While not directly programming language related, I still think this paper might be of interest. Frege is quite an important figure in the history of logic, of course, and as we all know logic and computation are very much related to each other. In addition, this paper deals with the notions of function and predicate, and these notions are part of our standard terminology. Reading this paper might improve our understanding of these notions and their history, as well as the notions of equality vs. identity, and intensional vs. extensional view of functions (see the end of section 4). Back to the future...So if Java is a victory for Smalltalk’s implementation choices, and Ruby is a victory for Smalltalk’s language choices, what do you do if you want both? There’s still only one option: use Smalltalk. You be the judge. Module Mania: A Type-Safe, Separately Compiled, Extensible InterpreterModule Mania: A Type-Safe, Separately Compiled, Extensible Interpreter
This is an excellent example of how the ML module language doesn't merely provide encapsulation but also strictly adds expressive power. It also demonstrates how a dynamic language (Lua) can be embedded in the statically-typed context of ML. Finally, it demonstrates that none of this need come at the expense of separate compilation or extensibility. Norman Ramsey's work is always highly recommended. By Paul Snively at 2005-12-07 14:58 | DSL | Functional | General | Implementation | Semantics | Theory | Type Theory | login or register to post comments | other blogs | 8863 reads
ClassicJava in PLT Redex
This might be interesting to folks curious about how to formalize a real language, or about how PLT Redex works in practice. By Paul Snively at 2005-12-07 14:51 | General | Implementation | Semantics | Theory | Type Theory | login or register to post comments | other blogs | 6870 reads
Misc Links
A couple of small items that caught my attention.
Code Reading
LtU readers know that I am long time advocate of code reading. As I've argued here in the past, reading great code is the best way to acquire good programming skills. It's also a pleasure to read good code. Yes - reading code can be fun.
It turns out that I am not alone (though my conception of a code reading workshop is perhaps somewhat different than the things discussed there). Anyway, this is a chance to continue one of my pet memes. Many of the pieces of great code I've read over the years come from language processing tools (e.g., compilers, meta-programming systems etc.) I don't think this is a coincidence. Now's your chance to tell us your favorite examples. The rules: The code must be beautiful and it must be programming language related (and no, being written in a programming language isn't enough). OCaml 3.0.9The most recent version of Objective Caml is 3.09.0. It was released on 2005-10-27. Some of the highlights in release 3.09 are:
For more information, please consult the comprehensive list of changes. By Mark Evans at 2005-11-10 03:34 | General | Object-Functional | Spotlight | 13 comments | other blogs | 13085 reads
Battling Bugs: A Digital Quagmire
From this Wired article:
In 1976, computer pioneer Edsger W. Dijstra made an observation that would prove uncanny: "Program testing can be quite effective for showing the presence of bugs," he wrote in an essay, "but is hopelessly inadequate for showing their absence."There's a bit to chew on here, including the by-now-de rigeur misidentification of Java, Python, and Perl as "type-safe languages." But I think the article is valuable in spite of that for its frank admission that even intense testing regimes aren't doing well at addressing serious quality issues. Daniel Jackson, leader of the Alloy project at MIT, is quoted. By Paul Snively at 2005-11-09 19:58 | General | Software Engineering | 41 comments | other blogs | 19414 reads
PDC videos online
Microsoft's PDC videos are online, including some that are of interest to us.
Paul Vick directs us to three presentations: (1) the future of VB; (2) Dynamic languages on the CLR; (3) LINQ. Note: You need to use IE to view these presentations. By Ehud Lamm at 2005-11-09 11:58 | General | login or register to post comments | other blogs | 4750 reads
OOPSLA 2005: Io, a small programming language
(via Keith)
Io is small, pure object oriented, prototype-based programming language. The ideas in Io are mostly inspired by Smalltalk (all values are objects), Self, NewtonScript and Act1 (prototype-based differential inheritance, actors and futures for concurrency), LISP (code is a runtime inspectable/modifiable tree) and Lua (small, embeddable). The paper and slides are available here. |
Browse archives
Active forum topics |
Recent comments
23 weeks 3 days ago
23 weeks 3 days ago
23 weeks 3 days ago
45 weeks 4 days ago
49 weeks 6 days ago
51 weeks 3 days ago
51 weeks 3 days ago
1 year 2 weeks ago
1 year 6 weeks ago
1 year 6 weeks ago