Curtis W | Lambda the Ultimate

Curtis W

view
track

type	title	author	last post
Forum topic	automatic theorem proving ok by Curtis W I'd phrase it this way: you by Curtis W	Curtis W	2006-08-09 14:01
Forum topic	Overloading : Why do some languages leave it out? You make it sound like by Curtis W subtyping by Curtis W not really by Curtis W	cdiggins	2006-08-08 21:28
Forum topic	OOP Parallel class hierarchies you're... by Curtis W No, I meant how did she know by Curtis W Actually it is not, as by Curtis W ...what type is actually by Curtis W Fixed. by Curtis W In your examples you by Curtis W On the surface, this looks by Curtis W They don't do the exact by Curtis W This discussion is really by Curtis W "Implicit downcasting" by Curtis W ...	dataangel	2006-07-18 19:50
Forum topic	DSLs and operator associativity/precedence That's true, but having no by Curtis W Many folks who took algebra by Curtis W Leaving out precedence by Curtis W smalltalk by Curtis W	dataangel	2006-07-11 05:20
Forum topic	What are the real benefits of FP? Actually, embedded scripting by Curtis W	dataangel	2006-07-09 20:03
Forum topic	Lexical structure of scripting languages You forgot about semantics. by Curtis W	uchchwhash	2006-07-07 23:48
Forum topic	Oxymoronic? "Safety-critical development guidelines for real-time Java" Either that, or use by Curtis W	raould	2006-07-01 15:52
Forum topic	Article: Exploring Cocoa with F-Script I suppose by Curtis W Ok. That seems kind of by Curtis W ok by Curtis W Interesting by Curtis W	pmougin	2006-06-30 13:53
Forum topic	The OO barrier For one thing, proving that by Curtis W What does state have to do by Curtis W Oh, thanks. by Curtis W What craziness are you by Curtis W So? You think you'll be able by Curtis W * interfaces where by Curtis W That's true for smalltalk's by Curtis W You could do it that way, by Curtis W Oh, I see. In that case, by Curtis W What do you mean by by Curtis W ...	snk_kid	2006-06-22 14:07
Forum topic	Why only 'minimal' languages I've done a lot of by Curtis W What do you mean by by Curtis W This is true, but misses by Curtis W That is true, however his by Curtis W I should also point out by Curtis W	Karsten Wagner	2006-06-19 15:33
Forum topic	A thought on the design of new low-level languages... Yes that is exactly what i by Curtis W define by Curtis W	snk_kid	2006-06-14 16:22
Forum topic	Multidimensional Virtual Classes Oh, I get it. Thanks for the by Curtis W ?? by Curtis W	Niels Hoogeveen	2006-06-10 06:39
Forum topic	Buried Treasure - No Fluff Just Stuff Nope. by Curtis W An array of int can be used by Curtis W What do you mean? by Curtis W An array (iterable), if you by Curtis W Can you correctly type by Curtis W I've no idea what variance by Curtis W The discussion was about by Curtis W Well, your shape example by Curtis W Of course, it would be more by Curtis W Actually, I already have an by Curtis W ...	Isaac Gouy	2006-06-08 03:44
Forum topic	Type checking and logical errors Guarantee what? We WANT to by Curtis W What? I'm confused--I'm by Curtis W Sort of. Warning at compile by Curtis W In any case, however, the by Curtis W Such a function is trivial by Curtis W There is no value of a by Curtis W Ah, I see. Clever. What by Curtis W Or, if you don't care about by Curtis W Which can ensure that by Curtis W What about something by Curtis W ...	Mike Smith	2006-06-05 21:16
first page previous page next page last page