Via the ATS mailing list:
However, there is a huge difference between mathematical proofs and programs.
A mathematical proof is often very robust in the sense that mistakes in handling minor details can likely be remedied. A popular saying is that mathematical theorems are almost always true while mathematical proofs almost always contain mistakes. On the other hand, programs are not robust at all: a typo is all you need to crash a program. The very selling point of programming-with-theorem-proving as is supported in ATS is to facilitate the construction of correct programs by taking advantage of the inherent robustness of mathematical proofs: force your programs to go through rigorous typechecking while trusting your theorems (without proofs).
Recent comments
3 hours 12 min ago
3 hours 58 min ago
8 hours 17 min ago
9 hours 17 min ago
9 hours 48 min ago
13 hours 44 min ago
19 hours 44 min ago
1 day 5 hours ago
1 day 5 hours ago
1 day 5 hours ago