Via the ATS mailing list:

However, there is a huge difference between mathematical proofs and programs.

A mathematical proof is often very robust in the sense that mistakes in handling minor details can likely be remedied. A popular saying is that mathematical theorems are almost always true while mathematical proofs almost always contain mistakes. On the other hand, programs are not robust at all: a typo is all you need to crash a program. The very selling point of programming-with-theorem-proving as is supported in ATS is to facilitate the construction of correct programs by taking advantage of the inherent robustness of mathematical proofs: force your programs to go through rigorous typechecking while trusting your theorems (without proofs).

## Recent comments

7 min 23 sec ago

16 min 39 sec ago

2 hours 31 min ago

2 hours 35 min ago

2 hours 36 min ago

2 hours 40 min ago

2 hours 41 min ago

4 hours 36 min ago

6 hours 16 min ago

6 hours 23 min ago