Via the ATS mailing list:

However, there is a huge difference between mathematical proofs and programs.

A mathematical proof is often very robust in the sense that mistakes in handling minor details can likely be remedied. A popular saying is that mathematical theorems are almost always true while mathematical proofs almost always contain mistakes. On the other hand, programs are not robust at all: a typo is all you need to crash a program. The very selling point of programming-with-theorem-proving as is supported in ATS is to facilitate the construction of correct programs by taking advantage of the inherent robustness of mathematical proofs: force your programs to go through rigorous typechecking while trusting your theorems (without proofs).

## Recent comments

9 hours 58 min ago

20 hours 32 min ago

20 hours 53 min ago

22 hours 10 min ago

22 hours 21 min ago

1 day 3 hours ago

1 day 6 hours ago

1 day 12 hours ago

1 day 21 hours ago

1 day 22 hours ago